Personnel: Les McCann- piano, electric piano, Moog synth; Corky Hale- harp; Yusef Lateef- flute, oboe, sax, percussion; David Spinozza, Cornell Dupree- guitars; Jimmy Rowser, Bill Salter- bass; Buck Clarke, William Clarke, Donald Dean, Alphonze Mouzon, Bernard Purdie- percussion, drums
That moment before; in that time of anticipation, the thinking that comes before a turn in your life, or some change. This music, or to be more precise the beginning of the first track, ‘The Lovers’ is a perfect representation of this feeling, or experience.
If you listen to these first five minutes or so, before Yusuf Lateef lets it rip with his unexpected Eastern-mystic sounds, the music offers a wonderful sensation of space and air – a mood of something, a kind of portent, meandering about: waiting/anticipating. (‘The secret weapon on 'The Lovers' is the plaintive, moaning oboe of Yusef Lateef: his snake-charmer lines and breathy, woody tones give the piece much of its sense of vulnerability and exotic surrender’ - to quote another). 'The Lovers' - 26 minutes long: filling the entire ‘A’ side of a long-playing record.
You can picture the musicians. Even if the sounds that they are creating are so ethereal and otherworldly, it’s hard to imagine the act of creation in itself: each instrument has its place, takes its turn, descending and falling, trickling about with such gentle reserve.
Here’s a description of that scene:
Around three minutes, it’s more intense certainly, speeding up and then, with some repetition you sense the change of what is going to come; the single drum-beat, as the keyboards return. The drums again, the echo starts. And then, and then it begins.
The AllMusic review states that ‘the 26-minute 'The Lovers' is more illustrative, freer in its essence and translation of the predominant free love theme of the '60s and '70s.’ It’s hard to say how this music can represent a theme of any kind, let alone ‘free love’ but it certainly represents a kind of pure musical freedom, and artistry.
Another writer said: ‘it takes the listener who accepts the invitation in the right spirit to many places, never substituting the pretty for the true.’
What I like about ‘The Lovers’ - or one of the things I like best about it, is the way the different parts appear to remain so boxed-in – three, or perhaps steps forward, three, four steps back – and yet together transform into a still-cool riotous momentum (forever becoming muted, at times). No showy solos here, the musicians are a unit, working together, relying on their instincts to produce music that is completely improvised. And that over the top woo-woo ghosty sound is so nice that comes from nowhere – to disappear again - about half-way in, to come back later in another form, more manic.
The rest of the album is just as impressive, showing off Les McCann’s contributions more, as the music offers a more conventional pattern; moving away from the intensity of enmeshment to a classic groove. Information gleaned from another source: there’s a ‘13-minute electronic revisit to 'Beaux J. Poo Boo' which McCann had recorded acoustically in 1965 and a 12-minute take of 'Poo Pye McGoochie.’
Les McCann is perhaps best known for ‘Compared to what’ – here live at Montreux in 1969.
Drenched in anger and indignation, a song that remains current:
I love to lie and lie to love
A-Hangin' on, we push and shove
Possession is the motivation
that is hangin' up the God-damn nation
Looks like we always end up in a rut (everybody now!)
Tryin' to make it real — compared to what? C'mon baby!
Slaughterhouse is killin' hogs
Twisted children killin' frogs
Poor dumb rednecks rollin' logs
Tired old lady kissin' dogs
I hate the human love of that stinking mutt (I can't use it!)
Try to make it real — compared to what? C'mon baby now!
The President, he's got his war
Folks don't know just what it's for
Nobody gives us rhyme or reason
Half of one doubt, they call it treason
We're chicken-feathers, all without one gut. God damn it!
Tryin' to make it real — compared to what? (Sock it to me)
Church on Sunday, sleep and nod
Tryin' to duck the wrath of God
Preacher's fillin' us with fright
They all tryin' to teach us what they think is right
They really got to be some kind of nut (I can't use it!)
Tryin' to make it real — compared to what?
Another reason to like this record is the way it has been written about. Reading jazz reviews is often an experience all of its own, as writers stretch to find words that might come to close to expressing what is so affecting them. Aware that they remain in a minority, like readers of poetry perhaps, it might be for that reason that they need to justify their fascination (all rather ironic when you consider that of all forms of music, Jazz in its purest form operates on the level of the gut - or soul if you want to be lofty, depending on your perspective).
See, for example, this writing
Acid-base stoichiometry? Or
Egyptian spaceship? (This shared enthusiasm, it’s so unfiltered and natural).
Here’s a brief description of McCann’s trajectory and status as a musician, from another review on AllAboutJazz -
'Les McCann is an interesting figure in jazz. After winning a talent contest on the Ed Sullivan Show in '56, McCann turned down an opportunity to join Cannonball Adderley's group, deciding instead to form his own jazz trio in Los Angeles. Playing a popular blend of hard bop and soul jazz, he signed with Pacific Jazz in '60, produced several enjoyable albums, and continued to develop and define the sound he wanted. That sound, a restless brew of jazz, funk, and soul, came to fruition on albums like 1968's Much Les and 1969's Swiss Movement, which produced the platinum-selling single "Compared to What."
As heard on these works, McCann had distinction in sound and style on piano and vocals, communicating with near pop-like fun and flair. McCann was poised to be great, yet something funny happened on the way to jazz stardom. Fusion, with its wild and wooly blend of traditional jazz and electronics, fractured the jazz fan base, leaving musicians like McCann a fractional audience. His '70s albums bathed too often in the waters of electronic wizardry, perhaps withering his acoustic jazz talents, or perhaps the audience for his experiments never caught up to his innovations.'
This extract from an interview with McCann by Bill Kopp, published in 2015 gives a sense of the man’s character and the motivations behind the creation of his music:
'McCann recalls his reaction at the Invitation to Openness session: “Oh my God: it really worked!” He says, “What you have to do is experiment. I’m creating 24 hours a day, and that’s the message I try to share with people. We came from creation; therefore, we are creation. It drives me crazy when people say [about themselves], ‘Oh, I wish I had a talent; I can’t do nuthin’.’ I say, ‘Shut the hell up. Get quiet, and look deeper into yourself. Not outside; look inside, and you’ll find everything you’re looking for.’”
“A song may live awhile, but as far as style, you can’t keep doing the same thing. That’s another reason I’m so happy about the idea I had for Invitation to Openness. I gave very few – if any – instructions. No rules; just play. Swiss Movement broke the door open for me: don’t lock everything into a set pattern. And that was very enlightening for me.
And his name is closely linked with what is known as soul-jazz. “I’m told that I was one of the first people the record companies put that title to,” McCann says. “The first album I did, on Pacific Jazz [in 1960], was called Plays the Truth. ‘Soul’ is just another word for feeling, and love. It’s all good. Soul is becoming aware of what’s inside of us. When you get passionate about something, you discover yourself.”
In fact, in Leonard Feather’s liner notes for his 1961 LP In San Francisco, McCann is quoted as saying, “I want my music to hit the emotion of human beings.” He goes on to say, “If jazz is played so it can be accepted, it will be accepted.” Since that quote comes from near the beginning of his recording career, I ask him if he’d like to expand on his comment. His terse reply: “No.”
That was then. I don’t go back, no,” he adds. “That’s what I said then; I’m not going to try and go back and figure out what I meant.” I press the subject a bit and ask if he agrees that music should be accessible. Again: “No. Don’t make no rules! Everything is already accessible. People say, ‘This is hard to play. This is hard to listen to.’ They have all these fuckin’ excuses. Shit. Give me a break! Just go do it. Find your heart, your passion. That’s the word. That’s soul, that’s love: everything that is the opposite of fear. We’ve all heard it a thousand, a million times. But we take a long time to heed the message.”
Not surprisingly, McCann has strong opinions regarding the current state of jazz. “Everything must change. And they’re trying to keep it the same. It won’t go nowhere; it died.” He observes, “Once you make a recording, it’s recorded that way: that’s how it is. And that’s the way that people who buy the records want to hear it.” That runs counter to the jazz aesthetic of never-the-same-way-twice. “Musicians understand that, but record companies are sayin’, ‘Fuck that. Make me some money!’”
“Jazz is dead,” McCann repeats. “We have to make it because we like it. I tell all the young people now, ‘If you’re really into it, it’s got to be a matter of life and death. If not, go find your passion."